The Election Day After Tomorrow

 New York’s “cap and invest” program (NYCI), a central part of the state’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, appears designed to hold back much of the program’s sticker-shock until January 2027—after the 2026 election.

About two-thirds of emissions would be subject to NYCI (pronounced “nicky”), meaning the companies responsible would need to purchase allowances from the state. Allowances would be required for most fuel purchases (federal law exempts aviation fuel), and officials are still deciding among other things whether the rules would apply to electric generators, who already pay into a separate system.

 

INBOX137957602d6443724cf5a7979f42a6902cd

Source: NYSERDA

The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) would determine how many allowances each company needs, establish a limit on the number of allowances sold in a year and place a ceiling on the price of those allowances. As the state approaches its 2030 emissions reduction goal (about 34 percent below 2021 levels), the number of allowances would shrink and the ceiling would rise.

Last week officials from NYSERDA, the state energy agency, presented a preliminary analysis showing how the program could look when it’s launched next year. While they emphasized the price levels were hypothetical, all three scenarios (see below) called for the price ceiling to more than double at the beginning of 2027. By comparison, price ceilings increase 5 to 6 percent in each of the other years.

 

INBOX13795725aeff6e015162aeb316983d8bd61

Put another way:

INBOX13795736bb629ad646fd658a327f62ce6ae

Under the “modeling exercise,” NYCI would add at least 13 to 21 cents to the cost of a gallon of gasoline in 2026—and 22 to 48 cents in 2027. The total cost in 2025 (in the hypothetical scenarios, in 2022 dollars) would range from $3.1 billion to $5 billion, rising to $5.6 billion to $11.9 billion in 2030. At least 30 percent of NYCI proceeds would be rebated back to at least some New Yorkers (possibly as a refundable tax credit). NYSERDA has indicated a significant portion of households will break even or come out ahead.

 

These are preliminary numbers, but the fact that the 2026-2027 jump was the basis for all three scenarios is a strong indicator this will be a feature of the program when it’s rolled out later this year.

This wouldn’t be the first time New York climate policy was molded with Election Day in mind.

As the Climate Act was being finalized in June 2019, a costly provision—requiring the state to get 38 percent of its electricity from renewables by 2022—was dropped. To put that in perspective, New York only reached 30 percent renewables in 2022 (a target previously set for 2015), and forcing utilities to pay subsidies equivalent to 8 percent of load would have pushed electricity rates considerably higher in 2022 when Governor Andrew Cuomo expected to be seeking a fourth term.

 

Meanwhile, the announcement of detailed regulations (such as bans on gas stoves and oil furnaces) was moved from June 2022 in the original version to December 2022 in the final text, putting it weeks after the 2022 gubernatorial election.

It’s difficult to square the apocalyptic rhetoric from state officials about the threat posed by climate change with New York again moving climate-policy timelines to mitigate electoral blowback. As a political move, however, given that the state is deliberately aiming to make things cost too much for people to keep using them, doing it after an election makes perfect sense.

 

The Election Day After Tomorrow - Empire Center for Public Policy

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New York --- What's keeping the lights on --- Grid Brief March 27

Image
  What’s Keeping the Lights On? March 27 , 2024   (Here is a graph – courtesy of Grid Brief -- showing the electric generation power source mix for New York State from  Mar 19  through  Mar 26 )   Natural gas, hydro, and nuclear kept the Empire State running.  That holds true for week after week after week. Hydro performed well last week. Nuclear was steady as always. Both of these sources are CO2 free, of course. Wind contributed something on Thursday and Friday of last week, with another little bump late Monday. Solar (yellow line) – essentially nothing.
Read more

There Once Was a Blade From Nantucket -- Doomberg

Image
  Aug 04, 2024 ∙  “There is no such thing as accident; it is fate misnamed.” – Napoleon Bonaparte The 1930s were distinctly warm years in many parts of the world, including the Atlantic basin. Although hurricanes were not yet named and tracked to the extent they are today, meteorologists tell us that the decade saw an unusually high number of powerful storms. Among them are the Category 5 Freeport Hurricane of 1932 and the Great New England Hurricane of 1938. The latter raced up the Atlantic Coast, ultimately crashing ashore on Long Island, New York, and then again in Connecticut. The  regional damage  was profound: “ Wind, fire, floodwaters, and tidal surges all caused damage in New England. In New London, Connecticut, the tidal surge drove the five-masted school ship Marsala into a warehouse complex along the docks, setting off a short circuit and fire which consumed a quarter-mile area of the business district – the worst calamity in New London since Benedict Arno...
Read more

What The Media Won’t Tell You About The Energy Transition

Image
  What The Media Won’t Tell You About The Energy Transition The hype, and the reality, about the energy transition in 10 charts   MAY 07, 2024   Cooling towers at India’s Mahatma Gandhi Super Thermal Power Project, a 1,320 MW coal-fired power plant in Haryana . Over the past few days, I’ve searched the NewsBank archive for uses of “energy transition.” One of the earliest uses of that now-ubiquitous phrase occurred in the  Christian Science Monitor  in 1981. In a dispatch from Nairobi, a reporter named Richard Critchfield explained that some “4,000 delegates from 154 countries” were gathering in the Kenyan capital for a two-week United Nations conference on new and renewable sources of energy. “The purpose of the conference,” Critchfield explained, was to “promote better understanding of the global energy transition from oil to such new sources as geothermal, solar, wind, ocean, and hydropower or energy from biomass, fuelwood, charcoal, peat, draught animals, oil...
Read more